2014考研英语一阅读,2014年考研英语阅读难度

  • 一年级
  • 2024-07-31

2014考研英语一阅读?2014年考研英语一阅读难度大。能掌握5500左右的词汇以及相关词组。除掌握词汇的基本含义外,考生还应掌握词汇之间的词义关系,如同义词、近义词、反义词等;掌握词汇之间的搭配关系,如动词与介词、形容词与介词、形容词与名词等;掌握词汇生成的基本知识,如词源、词根、词缀等。题型分布不同:1、那么,2014考研英语一阅读?一起来了解一下吧。

2014年考研英语阅读难度

近二十年英语一难度排序如下:

2010、2011、2021、2015、2006、2013、2019、2018、2007、2020、2014、2005、2012、2017、2016

拓展资料:

1、20考研的“完形”和“新题型”稍难,分别为4.44分和4.12分。“阅读”和“翻译”稍简单,分别为20.96分和4.22分。写作部分则相对稳定,大作文和小作文分别为10.42分和5.03分。

2、对于许多英语薄弱的考研人来说,知晓考研英语这几年的难易程度和题型变化,有利于在备考中有的放矢,着重基础,找到复习方向。武汉文都考研小嘟老师整理了近些年考研英语阅读难易系数对照表,考研英语历年试题的难度参差不齐,但是总体会控制在一定程度,不过2021年的题目确实会略难一些,因此,大家某年或某篇阅读的错误率较高,不妨对照一下难度系数表,有可能是文章本身难度较大。

3、希望大家能够通过历年真题的考察内容更加了解每个模块的考察特点;合理预判考试难度及题型(新题型/写作作);合理制定每个模块目标分数;结合历年难度系数对照自己刷题情况,减少焦虑情绪(你难大家都难!)

4、一般来说,试题难度就是有多少比例考生答对题目。

英语一考研历年真题

我觉得很难,哈哈,因为我一直英语很烂,阅读全是乱写 ,哎 今年考研无希望了,收拾东西寒假滚回家找工作去喽

2014英语一第二篇阅读答案

近二十年英语一难度排序如下:

2010、2011、2021、2015、2006、2013、2019、2018、2007、2020、2014、2005、2012、2017、2016

拓展资料:

1、20考研的“完形”和“新题型”稍难,分别为4.44分和4.12分。“阅读”和“翻译”稍简单,分别为20.96分和4.22分。写作部分则相对稳定,大作文和小作文分别为10.42分和5.03分。

2、对于许多英语薄弱的考研人来说,知晓考研英语这几年的难易程度和题型变化,有利于在备考中有的放矢,着重基础,找到复习方向。

武汉文都考研小嘟老师整理了近些年考研英语阅读难易系数对照表,考研英语历年试题的难度参差不齐,但是总体会控制在一定程度,不过2021年的题目确实会略难一些,因此,大家某年或某篇阅读的错误率较高,不妨对照一下难度系数表,有可能是文章本身难度较大。

3、希望大家能够通过历年真题的考察内容更加了解每个模块的考察特点;合理预判考试难度及题型(新题型/写作作);合理制定每个模块目标分数;结合历年难度系数对照自己刷题情况,减少焦虑情绪(你难大家都难!)

4、一般来说,试题难度就是有多少比例考生答对题目。

2014年英语一阅读4

2014年的英语考试已经比去年较难,考研阅读特点之一是文章很难读懂,有些考生由于词汇量小,句子分析能力差,根本读不懂文章,所以也无法考到理想的分数。其次是选项迷惑性大,排除错误选项需要很多时间,而且不一定选对。作为考研英语试卷体系中发展最成熟、题型最稳定的部分,阅读主要考查的是考生理解文章结构、把握具体信息和解答不同类型题目的能力。

2014年考研英语阅读题型

我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题,你看看吧,或许对你有帮助

Text 1

In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?

More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.

Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.

But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU.

21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to

[A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.

[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking.

[C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily.

[D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit.

22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means

[A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre.

[B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government.

[C] to register for an allowance from the government.

[D] to attend a governmental job-training program.

23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?

[A] A desire to secure a better life for all.

[B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed.

[C] An urge to be generous to the claimants.

[D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.

24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel

[A] uneasy.

[B] enraged.

[C] insulted.

[D] guilty.

25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree?

[A] The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness.

[B] Osborne’s reform will reduce the risk of unemployment.

[C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs.

[D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.

Text 2

All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.

During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.

There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.

Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.

The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.

In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow.

26. A lot of students take up law as their profession due to

[A] the growing demand from clients

[B] the increasing pressure of inflation

[C] the prospect ofworking in big firms

[D] the attraction of financial rewards

27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal education in most American states?

[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraduate studies

[B] Receiving training by professional associations

[C] Admissions approval from the bar association

[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major

28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from

[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession

[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance

[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.

[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism

29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because

[A] prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.

[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.

[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.

[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.

30. In the text, the author mainly discusses

[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.

[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.

[C] the role undergraduate studies in America’s legal education.

[D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.

以上就是2014考研英语一阅读的全部内容,2014年考研英语考试阅读整体难度持续稳定 我发现70%的考生认为今年考研英语整体的难度是稳中稍微有点偏容易的,有20%的考生认为很难,最后剩下10%的考生难度是适中的。通过这样简单的调查可以看出,这背后会有一个样本量的问题。今年的考试整体而言第一感觉,整体上从完形填空最后到作文,看完以后。

猜你喜欢